Thursday, February 28, 2019

Treasury Secretary Mnuchin says tax refunds are now back at last year's level

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin on Thursday sought to quell concerns about lower tax refunds this tax season, offering new data showing a recent surge in refunds.

"People have been very focused on tax refunds," Mnuchin told CNBC's Hadley Gamble. "Tax refunds are up 17 percent week over week. That basically gets us to the same level as last year."

He didn't give a dollar amount, and the Treasury Department did not immediately respond to a CNBC query.

The tax filing season kicked off at the end of January and there has been grumbling about lower refunds, even though many consumers saw a tax break last year with the new bill. Through Feb. 15, the average refund check was down 16 percent from last year, according to the IRS.

"I would emphasize that even if people had perfectly done their withholding — withholding is complicated and I encourage people to go to the withholding calculator — people really should be focused on the fact they're paying lower taxes," Mnuchin said. "Those lower taxes is money going back into the economy, and that's why we have the economic growth we do."

show chapters Watch CNBC's full interview with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Watch CNBC's full interview with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin    1 Hour Ago | 08:43

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Sensient Technologies Corp (SXT) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

Sensient Technologies Corp (NYSE:SXT) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. Sensient Technologies Corp operates in the chemical industry. It manufactures colors, flavors and fragrances used to develop foods and beverage systems, cosmetic and pharmaceuticals. Sensient Technologies Corp has a market cap of $2.74 billion; its shares were traded at around $64.87 with a P/E ratio of 17.48 and P/S ratio of 1.97. The dividend yield of Sensient Technologies Corp stocks is 2.13%. Sensient Technologies Corp had annual average EBITDA growth of 2.60% over the past ten years. GuruFocus rated Sensient Technologies Corp the business predictability rank of 3-star.

For the last quarter Sensient Technologies Corp reported a revenue of $324.6 million, compared with the revenue of $328.9 million during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $1.4 billion, an increase of 1.8% from last year. For the last five years Sensient Technologies Corp had an average revenue decline of 1.3% a year.

The reported diluted earnings per share was $3.7 for the year, an increase of 82.3% from previous year. Over the last five years Sensient Technologies Corp had an EPS growth rate of 10.6% a year. The Sensient Technologies Corp had a decent operating margin of 14.67%, compared with the operating margin of 12.32% a year before. The 10-year historical median operating margin of Sensient Technologies Corp is 12.73%. The profitability rank of the company is 7 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, Sensient Technologies Corp has the cash and cash equivalents of $31.9 million, compared with $29.3 million in the previous year. The long term debt was $689.6 million, compared with $604.2 million in the previous year. The interest coverage to the debt is 9.3. Sensient Technologies Corp has a financial strength rank of 6 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $64.87, Sensient Technologies Corp is traded at 33.4% premium to its historical median P/S valuation band of $48.61. The P/S ratio of the stock is 1.97, while the historical median P/S ratio is 1.49. The intrinsic value of the stock is $39.70 a share, according to GuruFocus DCF Calculator. The stock lost 8.49% during the past 12 months.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of SXT, click here.

Monday, February 25, 2019

How PayPal Muscled To The Top Of The Digital Money Stack

&l;p&g;It is time to address the elephant in the room:

Many tech companies have a valuation problem.

&l;strong&g;PayPal&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;builds software platforms to move money. It also has a market cap of $112 billion. That&s;s substantially more than&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;American Express&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;at $91 billion and&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Goldman Sachs&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;at $73 billion.

&l;img class=&q;dam-image ap size-large wp-image-37ddf5d88ae549baa9e58e691a5ec5f4&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/37ddf5d88ae549baa9e58e691a5ec5f4/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;654&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; PayPal CEO Dan Schulman participates in the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit: A World of Change at The TimesCenter on Thursday, Sept. 20, 2018, in New York. (Photo by Evan Agostini/Invision/AP)

For many, this is a sign that tech is overpriced. That may be true for some stocks in this sector. But don&s;t be quick to use valuation to write off PayPal. Let me explain &a;hellip;

It used to be that investors were willing to pay up for growth, or even a big idea. In the 1990s, Dell Computer zoomed higher because investors believed its mail-order business model was the future.

For a long while, it was. But when the internet and the cloud replaced the PC buzz,&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Amazon.com&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;and&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Salesforce&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;were supposed to change the face of business.

And they did.

Sometimes, investors get the big picture right. Paying up to participate is not a terrible idea.

PayPal is sitting on a really big idea.

When the company&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44161814&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;added iZettle&l;/a&g;&a;nbsp;back in May 2018, it was the final piece of a suite of digital platforms. The Swedish mobile payments company is in 12 European markets with credit-card readers, point-of-sale systems and software tools. Customers&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;http://em.weisspublishinginc.com/G5U0Nx30nV0QN0vH000073d&q; target=&q;_blank&q; rel=&q;noopener noreferrer&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;can build&a;nbsp;&l;/a&g;secure webshops, process payments, determine logistics and perform sales analytics.

It is all part of a larger process to merge the physical and digital worlds.&a;nbsp;Preferably with all transactions flowing through a PayPal gatekeeper.

In 2018, PayPal acquired Fraud Services and Bill Me Later. The fraud-detection services dovetailed nicely with Zong, the micropayments company it acquired in 2011. It allowed customers to transact tiny payments even if the participants did not have credit cards. And there have been investments in&a;nbsp;Braintree,&a;nbsp;Venmo&a;nbsp;and&a;nbsp;Xoom, to bulk up merchant and peer-to-peer payments.

In 2015, the digital payments company&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://venturebeat.com/2015/08/19/paypal-acquires-mobile-commerce-platform-modest-run-by-obamas-former-campaign-cto/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;acquired Modest&l;/a&g;, a customer experience company. Swift Financial was&a;nbsp;folded&a;nbsp;into the platform to provide small-business lending in 2017.

&l;strong&g;Visa Inc.,&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;a PayPal strategic partner, forecasts that the digital portion of total global spend, now $17 trillion, will rise from 9% in 2017 to 15% by 2020. That would be an annual compound growth rate of 20%.

Financial technology skeptics argue companies like PayPal are reinventing the wheel. For all the talk about a cashless society, the U.S. Federal Reserve&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/coin_currcircvalue.htm&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;reports&l;/a&g;&a;nbsp;the demand for physical cash is still growing.

Since 2008, U.S. dollars in circulation have ballooned by 77%. The metric grew by 7.4% to $1,571 billion in 2017. For perspective, that is 204 greenbacks for every person on the planet.

And while the managers at PayPal have great plans for the future, for now all of their platforms still depend on a physical bank account regulated under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

A bet on PayPal stock now&a;nbsp;is a wager the company can build an end-to-end solution of what Dan Schulman, chief operating officer,&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-01-08/paypal-escaped-obscurity-by-embracing-credit-card-competitors&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;calls&l;/a&g;&a;nbsp;an operating system for digital commerce.

In that race, PayPal has the inside track.

It has partnerships with Visa,&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Mastercard&l;/strong&g;,&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Apple&l;/strong&g;,&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Alphabet&l;/strong&g;, Samsung,&a;nbsp;&l;strong&g;Citibank&l;/strong&g;&a;nbsp;and a lot of other larger companies that would otherwise be foes. PayPal also has $10.5 billion in cash sitting on its books.

At 31x forward earnings and 7x sales, the stock is hardly cheap. Then again, the best big, longer-term ideas rarely are.

PayPal is a stock to buy into the next stock market crisis.&l;/p&g;

Saturday, February 23, 2019

Federal regulators just removed a barrier to exporting more US natural gas

Federal regulators on Thursday broke an impasse over approving new projects to export natural gas from the United States, potentially easing the way for a flurry of applications to build the multi-billion dollar facilities.

In doing so, the regulators approved a liquefied natural gas export terminal for the first time in two years, pushing through a disagreement over how they should assess the facilities' contribution to climate change. However, divisions remain within the commission on the issue, and one of the four sitting members dissented from the majority decision.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Thursday decided to approve Venture Global's proposed Calcasieu Pass export terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, as well as a pipeline to supply the facility. The project is one of about a dozen vying to tap surging U.S. natural gas production and export LNG, a form of the fuel chilled to liquid form and shipped overseas in massive tankers.

However, applications have been held up while FERC's four commissioners hash out the greenhouse gas issue. The five-person commission has been down one member since former commissioner and Republican Kevin McIntyre passed away last month, leaving the body split between two Democrats and two Republicans.

FERC Chairman Neil Chatterjee said he's optimistic that in light of Thursday's deal, FERC now has a framework in place that will help the commission more expeditiously process applications.

"No question about it, it's a top priority of mine and I think my colleagues' as well," he told CNBC on Friday.

Neil Chatterjee, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), listens during an open meeting in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Dec. 20, 2018. Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images Neil Chatterjee, chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), listens during an open meeting in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Thursday, Dec. 20, 2018.

FERC has authority over interstate oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines, but it also plays a role in approving LNG export terminals, along with the Department of Energy.

Democratic commissioners Cheryl LaFleur and Richard Glick have pushed FERC to exercise its authority to conduct environmental reviews to assess planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions linked to the nation's growing LNG infrastructure.

Chatterjee is a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. He drew attention early in his tenure at FERC for voicing support for a controversial Trump administration plan to bolster uncompetitive coal and nuclear power plants, but ultimately concurred with a unanimous decision to shoot down the proposal.

His fellow Republican commissioner, Roger McNamee, helped design the plan at the Department of Energy. He lost the support of West Virginia Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin during his FERC nomination after video emerged of McNamee expressing climate change denial.

On Thursday, FERC commissioners reached a compromise of sorts. In approving the Calcasieu Pass project, FERC disclosed the direct greenhouse gas impacts of the project and compared them to the nation's overall inventory of emissions.

Continuing division

LaFleur, who voted to approve the project, said the greenhouse gas disclosure and comparison "provided important context" but said it was only a "first step."

She criticized the commission's "failure" to disclose how the project would contribute to the combined effects of LNG infrastructure development. She also said FERC should have made a determination on the significance of the project's greenhouse gas emissions, an endeavor she called challenging but achievable.

"Indeed, the Commission makes challenging determinations on quantitative and qualitative issues in many other areas of our work, but has simply chosen not to attempt a significance determination in this context," she wrote on Thursday.

Glick, the sole dissenting member, said FERC failed to embrace "reasoned" decision-making while determining whether Calcasieu Pass is in the public interest. He said it failed to meet FERC's requirements under the Natural Gas Act and the National Environmental Policy Act.

"Neither the NGA nor NEPA permit the Commission to assume away the climate change implications of constructing and operating an LNG facility that will directly emit large volumes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions," he wrote in his dissent. "Yet that is precisely what is happening today."

Since FERC is a quasi-judicial body that sets precedent, Chatterjee says he is confident the commission has a way to address the climate question in future applications, now that a majority has determined FERC's approach is legally viable and durable.

"The reason for my sense of optimism on the pipeline of projects going forward is that from a macro level the biggest sticking point seemed to be how to address this question of considering GHG emissions," he said.

Friday, February 22, 2019

Casa Systems, Inc. (CASA) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Casa Systems, Inc.  (NASDAQ:CASA)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 21, 2019, 5:00 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, greetings and welcome to Casa Systems' Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this program is being recorded.

It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Eleanor Johnson, Investor Relations for Casa Systems. Thank you. You may begin.

Eleanor Johnson -- Investor Relations

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. CASA released results for the fourth quarter and full year 2018 ended December 31, 2018 this afternoon, after the market close. CASA also announced it actually entered an agreement to acquire NetComm Wireless this afternoon, after the market close. If you did not receive a copy of our earnings release or the transaction press release, you may obtain them from the Investor Relations section of our website at investors.casa-systems.com.

With me on today's call are Jerry Guo, Chief Executive Officer; Maurizio Nicolelli, Chief Financial Officer; and Scott Bruckner, SVP, Strategy and Corporate Development. This call is being webcast and will be archived on the Investor Relations section of our website.

Before I turn the call over to Jerry, I'd like to note that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements based on the business environment as we currently see it, and as such, does include certain risks and uncertainties. Statements in this communication regarding the Company and transaction that are forward-looking, including financial projections and projections as to the anticipated benefits of the transaction are based on management's estimates and assumptions and are subject to significant uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of the Company.

Please refer to our press releases and our SEC filings for more information on these specific risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the projections described in today's discussion. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call or in the earnings release or transaction release are based upon information that we believe as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events.

In addition to U.S. GAAP reporting, we report certain financial measures that do not conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. During the call, we may use non-GAAP measures if we believe it is useful to investors or if we believe it will help investors better understand our performance or business trends.

And with that, I would like to turn the call over to Jerry.

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. We have four agenda for our call today. First, I would like to discuss our fourth quarter and the full-year results for 2018 and our outlook for 2019. Second, I am excited to announce our agreement to acquire 100% of NetComm Wireless, and I will discuss the details of this transaction, our strategic rationale and the many benefits that we believe it will bring to both CASA and Netcomm. Third, I want to introduce you to our new CFO, Maurizio Nicolelli, who will discuss our financial results in detail. Provide our financial guidance for 2019 and discuss the $75 million share buyback program we announced in our earnings release.

Let me now turn to our fourth quarter and fiscal year 2018 results. For the fourth quarter, as we noted in our pre-announcement release, our results were impacted by lower than expected spending by certain MSO customers, particularly in hardware. We also experienced longer than anticipated wireless product certification and acceptance testing which are affecting the timing of our Wireless revenue recognition. I will discuss this in more detail later in my remarks, but we do anticipate having certification and acceptance testing on this product completed and the revenue recognized in both the first and second half of this year. While we were within guidance on non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share, we delivered lower than anticipated revenue due to these two issues.

During the fourth quarter, we generated revenue of $67.8 million representing a 43% decline year-over-year from Q4 2017. And the $297 million for the full year, representing a decline of 16% from the prior year. Our margins, on the other hand, remained strong at 73% for both Q4 and full-year due to the increased share of software-based capacity expansions in our revenue mix, both during Q4 and for the full year.

Given the trends in customer procurement that we saw during 2018, the lower CapEx spend announcements made by certain customers for 2019. And while we await initial 5G spend and a more aggressive shift to DAA in cable, we are taking a conservative approach to our outlook for 2019. For the coming full year, we expect revenue in a range of $250 million to $300 million, with the gross margin in a range of 65% to 70%, and a reduced EBITDA and earnings per share relative to 2018, as we accelerate our investment in R&D and the sales and marketing in wireless and the fixed telco.

This is an important year for CASA in the wireless space, and I'm committed to ensuring that we are fully prepared for the very large revenue opportunity in wireless that we see ahead. In addition, we are committing additional resources to the development of a new 5G video solutions. Accordingly, we are pulling forward some of our planned R&D spend for 2020 into this current fiscal year. Maurizio will comment on this in more detail in his remarks.

While we are disappointed with our top line results in the fourth quarter, there were several positive developments in our business, during the quarter and the past year that I would like to point out. We gained additional footprint in CCAP with two of our largest customers. We closed and shipped a major deal in distributed access architecture representing almost 17% of revenue during the quarter. We expanded our wireless customer footprint as we entered into multiple wireless deals, including one with a new and important Tier 1 operator. We added six new customers, one of which is a Tier 1 operator as I just noted.

Finally during 2018, we continue to implement a significant cable rollout of DOCSIS 3.1 in Germany with Vodafone. This represented a material footprint expansion for us in 2018 with a major diversified communications service provider. We also continue to strongly position ourselves for future business by increasing our trial activity. As a reminder, during the third quarter, we were engaged in 56 active trials with 40 customers, including 26 in wireless, seven in fixed telco and 23 in cable, for both our integrated CCAP and a remote PHY products.

During the fourth quarter, we converted five active trials, two in DAA, one in CCAP and two in mobile into orders and increased the overall number of trials we are supporting to 67 with 49 customers. These include 27 in wireless involving both our software products and our video products, eight in fixed telco with our virtual BNG and PON products and 32 in cable for DAA, integrated CCAP and the virtual CCAP core.

Turning to near-term trends and drivers for our business. Let me start with cable. As we noted on our last call, with the several years of significant CapEx spend to upgrade and more capacity in the network, we believe that our cable business is and will continue to be for the near-term in a digesting period. During the fourth quarter, our customers again invested more in software capacity expansion rather than large scale appliance purchases. This does not signify any footprint loss, but rather a shift toward more software license sales to feed additional capacity into our extensive installed base of chassis.

As I noted earlier, hardware as a percentage of total revenue has been declining with demand steadily shifting toward more software-based capacity expansions. We continue to believe that many of our customers will move forward with the DAA, and as is evident in the trial and new order numbers I just gave you. And our DAA remote PHY business has been very active.

However, we believe that the pace of DAA conversions will be slower than originally anticipated. As I have said previously, shifting intelligent network functions to outside plant is a complicated endeavor with similar technology alternatives for MSO to choose from including Remote PHY, Remote MAC-PHY spectrum expansion and the full duplex Remote PHY.

As a result, the move to DAA will likely occur as part of a multi-year upgrade process. Additionally, we believe that some MSOs will further delay DAA spend decisions, as they await the availability for the second generation knows. We expect that in 2019 our cable customers will satisfy their bandwidth growth through a combination of software license and long capacity expansions, some chassis purchases and some DAA deployments.

In our wireless business, while we were able to recognize some revenue in the fourth quarter, we are continuing to work on final certification, shipment acceptance of more than $20 million of wireless backlog. In the meantime, we continue to make progress with additional wins. As I mentioned earlier in my remarks and with continued trials of our full wireless product portfolio, including our Apex Strand micro cell, Apex Lifestyle center cells, and small cell cores, and our Axyom 4G/5G packet core.

Having said that, with 5G standards only recently set and uncertainty around timing for the CBRS spectrum auction. We believe that the ramp in expanding wireless by the mobile network operators and MSOs will not begin to occur meaningfully until 2020. However, we expect 2019 to be an active year for us in this space as we respond to RFPs and engage in trials.

Given the magnitude of network transformation, we are associated with the shift to 5G, the opportunity presented to us by wireless is huge. As a reminder, while the TAM for our CCAP DAA business is expected to increase from $1.5 billion to $1.8 billion by 2021, wireless represents a material expansion opportunity for our company that brings our total TAM to over $20 billion by 2021.

As such wireless remains a key focus for our future business to ensure that we remain at the cutting the edge of delivering innovative and differentiated products, and to capitalize on these sizable growth opportunities. As I noted earlier, we'll be accelerating investment in R&D and sales in this area, which will impact EBITDA and EPS in 2019. Maurizio will discuss this in more detail in his remarks.

In our fixed telco segment, customer reception engagement for our Axyom Virtual BNG router and the Multiservice Router remains very strong. We have deployed our Virtual BNG to a Tier 1 fixed telco in eight current trials, two of which are with the Tier 1 diversified communications service providers.

While 2018 was a much slower year than we anticipated, I remain extremely optimistic about our business and believe that 2019 will be an important year for CASA. Given the number of trials we are in, the deployments of new products we are starting to see, new customers in strategic markets across the globe, and the very positive feedback we are getting from customers about our solutions, mobile and fixed telco. We believe that we are well-positioned for the huge opportunity presented by the transformation in network architecture, our service providers are beginning to implement.

And it is with this large market opportunity in mind particularly in wireless that we have announced our first acquisition. I'm very excited about our agreement to acquire NetComm for AUD161 million in all-cash transaction. NetComm based in Australia is a leading global provider of fixed wireless access products and fixed broadband connectivity solutions, some of the many benefits of this deal include highly complementary product portfolios with no product overlap. This enables us to create an end-to-end solution from the core to the user equipment for our customers with the addition of high value fixed wireless access devices. In addition this combination creates opportunity for material revenue synergies through cross-selling of our respective products to each other's customers.

Attractive synergies that we believe are relatively quick to achieve and that we estimate will add additional -- incremental adjusted EPS of $0.02 to $0.03 in fiscal 2019 and $0.07 to $0.08 in fiscal 2020. This transaction has three Tier 1 diversified communication service providers to our customer portfolio increases our scale and materially expands our TAM, while positioning CASA as a key player in what we believe will be a large 5G fixed wireless access market.

The transaction will be funded by cash on hand and expected to be accretive on an adjusted earnings per share basis in calendar year 2019. We expect to close this acquisition in the second quarter of this year.

Before turning to a few slides that we have prepared on this acquisition, I like to turn the call over to Maurizio for a detailed review of our financial performance and our outlook for 2019.

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Jerry, and good afternoon, everyone. I will start by reviewing our fourth quarter and full year 2018 financial results and then discuss our outlook for fiscal 2019.

As Jerry mentioned earlier, our fourth quarter results were in line with the preliminary results we provided on January 17. Total revenue for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $67.8 million, down from a 118 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. Total product revenue was $57.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, of which $24.6 million or 43% was from hardware and $32.8 million or 57% was from software. This compares to a $106.7 million of total product revenue in the fourth quarter of last year with $56.3 million or 53% from hardware and $50.4 million or 47% from software, continuing the trend of increased software revenue as a percentage of our total product revenue.

Hardware sales during the fourth quarter and the full year respectively accounted for 36% and 45% of revenue, down from 48% in the prior year quarter and 56% of sales for all of 2017. Customers continued to invest in software-based capacity expansions, while they digest hardware purchased during prior peak.

Our GAAP gross margin for the fourth quarter of 2018 was a healthy 73.2% compared to 77.1% in the fourth quarter of 2017. The decrease in our gross margin was primarily due to a lower gross margin on some of our broadband products during the quarter. As a reminder, our gross margin can fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter based on a mix of sales of our hardware products with higher initial software-enabled capacity and software-enabled capacity expansions.

As we scale our wireless business, we continue to expect that our revenue distribution will tilt slightly toward hardware initially with first phase orders from our Apex family of RAN products, including our small cell core and purchases of 4G and 5G software cores likely starting late in the first or second quarter of 2019. As a result, we believe that our fiscal 2019 margin will be in the range between 65% and 70%.

Turning to expenses, total GAAP operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2018 were $32.8 million, down 10.2% compared to $36.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. The decrease in total operating expenses was due to lower commission and bonus compensation as a result of reduced revenue, partially offset by additional research and development investments.

Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $21.6 million compared to $59.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, primarily due to lower revenue in the current year period.

We recorded a net benefit of $1.7 million in our provision for income taxes during the fourth quarter. As in previous quarters, during the fiscal year, this was related to exercises and sales of equity awards by our employees. We currently expect that our effective tax rate for 2019 will range between 0% and 10% as we project to benefit from equity award transactions during the fiscal year.

Non-GAAP net income for the fourth quarter of 2018 was $17.3 million compared to $45.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.20 for the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to $0.54 for the fourth quarter of 2017.

Free cash flow for the quarter totaled $2.7 million compared to $43.6 million for the same period in 2017. The decline in free cash flow was driven by increased inventory and lower accrued expenses, offset by a reduction in our days sales outstanding from a 124 days at the end of fiscal 2017 to 98 days at December 31, 2018.

We ended the fourth quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $280.6 million and total debt of $295.5 million. During the three months ended December 31, 2018, we repurchased and retired 2.1 million shares for $29.4 million before commissions, thereby completing purchases under the $75 million stock repurchase program that was announced in August of 2018. As we announced today, the Board of Directors has approved an additional $75 million for our share repurchase program, which we intend to execute on during the next 12 months.

For the full year 2018, we achieved revenue of $297.1 million, a decrease of 15.5% compared to the prior year period. Total product revenue was $257 million in 2018, of which $133.4 million or 52% was from hardware and a $123.6 million or 48% was from software. This compares the $311.9 million of total product revenue in 2017 with a $198.1 million or 64% from hardware, and $113.7 million or 36% from software.

Our GAAP gross margin for the full year 2018 was 73.4%, which was identical to 2017. Total GAAP operating expenses for the full year 2018 was $139 million or 47% of revenue compared to $121.8 million or 35% of revenue in 2017.

Adjusted EBITDA for the full year 2018 was $98.1 million compared to $153.1 million in 2017. And non-GAAP net income for the full year 2018 was $81.5 million or $0.88 per diluted share for the full year 2018, compared to $110.2 million or $1.31 per diluted share in 2017.

Now I would like to turn to our guidance for the fiscal year 2019. Our guidance for 2019 reflects two main themes. First, we continue to project that our largest cable customers will continue to digest the significant capacity expansions from hardware purchases during the past 12 months. As such, we do see reduced hardware purchases, offset by continued software based capacity expansions.

Second, as Jerry mentioned, the wireless opportunity for us is very large. Given the magnitude of the opportunity, we are planning to accelerate investment in our wireless research and development plant for 2020 into 2019, which will reduce our operating income.

For the full year of 2019, we expect total revenue to be between $250 million and $300 million. Revenue in the first half is expected to be approximately 40% of the annual total with the first quarter being the lowest revenue quarter for the year. As mentioned earlier, we expect our gross margin in the range between 65% and 70%.

During the first half of 2019, we expect to begin recognizing wireless revenue primarily from hardware purchases by customers. These products have a lower margin, thus reducing our overall gross margin for the year.

Adjusted EBITDA is expected to range between $50 million and $60 million. Our effective income tax rate, as discussed earlier, will range between 0% and 10%. We anticipate non-GAAP diluted income per share to be in a range of $0.30 and $0.40, and GAAP diluted income per share to be in the range of $0.20 and $0.30. Stock-based compensation is expected to be approximately $11 million in 2019.

Guidance for fiscal 2019 does not include results from the expected acquisition of NetComm. If the acquisition closes in our second quarter, we project non-GAAP diluted income per share accretion between $0.02 and $0.03 in 2019 and $0.07 and $0.08 in 2020 from attractive deal synergies.

In summary, fiscal 2019 is a transition year for our company as we intend to invest to meet the significant opportunity ahead of us, while we allocate capital to inorganic growth to select M&A opportunities and returning capital to shareholders through share repurchases.

I will now turn the call over to Scott Bruckner, Senior Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development, to review the details of the NetComm transaction, our strategic rationale and the many benefits that we believe it will bring to both CASA and NetComm.

Scott Bruckner -- Senior Vice President, Strategy & Corporate Development

Thank you, Maurizio. Before I jump into the presentation, I just want to note to everybody that in the Investor Relations section of our website, there is a presentation that accompanies today's call. You can find it at investors.casa-systems.com under News & Events and then Events & Presentations, directly under the webcast link.

So with that, I want to echo what Jerry has said about this transaction. We're pretty excited about it and we have prepared a short deck as I've mentioned to brief you on the key transaction terms and on NetComm Wireless. And what I would like to cover are the transaction terms and process, a summary of the NetComm Wireless business, and importantly, a summary of why we did this deal and what benefits we think it brings to CASA, as we continue to build our position as a leading enabler of gigabit speeds for cable, wireless and fixed telco.

So if we -- for those of you following along, please turn to Slide 3. These are the transaction highlights. And as we noted in our press release announcing our agreement to acquire NetComm Wireless, we have agreed to pay AUD1.10, that's Australian dollars per share, and with approximately $146 million fully diluted shares outstanding. This values the company at around AUD161 million or approximately $114 million.

We are financing the acquisition as Maurizio said with cash on hand and the deal is being executed under a scheme of arrangement with customary closing conditions that include Australian Court approval, shareholder approval and Foreign Investment Review Board approval in Australia. And with all of that, we do expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2019.

One key highlight is that we anticipate this deal to be immediately EPS accretive, and I'll talk about this more later in my remarks. With that I'd ask you to turn to Slide 4, where I'd like to tell you a little bit about NetComm. The company is a leading developer of network grade telecommunications equipment that includes 4G and 5G wireless access solutions, solutions from the cabinet or curb to the customer premise for fiber-to-the-distribution point broadband architectures, and I'll explain that in just a bit, industrial IoT and fixed broadband residential gateways.

It's largest customers that are publicly disclosed include NBN, the National Broadband Network in Australia, AT&T, Bell Canada among others. The company is based in Sydney, Australia. It is listed on the ASX, has around 250 employees, 155 of whom are engineers, which will add significantly to our existing pool of R&D talent. And briefly on NetComm's financials for fiscal year 2018, the company generated just over AUD180 million in revenue and for fiscal year 2019 has guided the market to approximately AUD210 million or $150 million at the midpoint of its range.

Turning to Slide 5, as we've mentioned, we think that this acquisition does bring significant benefit to both companies, but there are several attractive elements of this deal that drew us to NetComm.

The first is that it enables us to offer end-to-end broadband solutions to our customers from the network core to user equipment with the addition of high value fixed wireless devices. As we have said previously, we do believe that fixed wireless access will be an important area of mobile network operator spend as they roll out their 5G networks. And in fact in an informal review that we conducted, there are approximately 15 large global mobile network operators that have already announced their intentions to make fixed wireless access part of their 5G network build-out.

Second, the acquisition expands our footprint by adding several Tier 1 service providers to our customer list. I've name the ones that are publicly disclosed, NBN, AT&T and Bell Canada.

Third, and importantly, it significantly expands our total addressable market for 5G fixed wireless access alone. That TAM is forecast to grow from just under $1 billion in 2021 to over $3 billion in 2025.

Fourth, the acquisition diversifies our revenues by customer and geography, while also increasing our scale. I will talk about pro forma revenue distribution in just a moment. But with respect to scale, using the midpoint of our fiscal year 2019 guidance range, the acquisition increases our revenue by greater than 50%.

And finally, we do see attractive synergies in this transaction. Importantly with minimal customer overlap, no product overlap, we see multiple cross-selling opportunities for our products into NetComm's customer channel, and likewise NetComm's products into our customer channel.

Let me now turn to Slide 6 and tell you a little bit about the product portfolio. We've outlined this portfolio that the acquisition brings to us, all of which, as Jerry noted, is incremental to what we currently offer. So NetComm has four product segments with approximately 90% of its revenues coming from three segments. The first is fixed wireless solutions which connects subscribers wirelessly to broadband with LTE and soon 5G wireless outdoor and indoor devices. Second products for fiber to the distribution point. This connects homes from the network node or curb or cabinet to deliver fiber-like speeds over copper without having to build fiber to the premise. And then industrial IoT, which represents an expansion of our business with 4G routers and modems that are currently deployed for enterprises connecting vending machines.

If I move to Slide 7 for your reference and I won't go through a lot of detail here. We've provided more detail on the products that NetComm offers in two important product categories for us 4G and 5G fixed wireless and fiber to the distribution point.

If I turn to Slide 8, you can see how we've tried to pull all of this together. So that is evident that how NetComm's products nicely slot into our product map. This gives CASA a fuller end-to-end solution for customers, and it extends our footprint in the network to the edge and user equipment. And we believe that this fuller portfolio gives CASA a more compelling offering for our customers, and importantly, it enhances our exposure with mobile network operators with fixed wireless products.

On Slide 9, as I previewed earlier, one of the important benefits of this acquisition is that it reduces our revenue concentration by customer and by geography. On a pro forma basis, North America share of CASA's revenue moves from 49% to 36% with significantly more balance across other regions of the world. And also on a pro forma basis, revenue contribution from our top four customers moves from 64% to 44%, and we add new Tier 1 customers that will account for almost a quarter of our pro forma revenue.

On Slide 10, and importantly, as we considered the rationale for this transaction, is how we build value for our shareholders. So, in addition to the strategic benefits that I've been talking about, we do believe that this acquisition will lead to increased value for shareholders as a result of increasing our revenue scale, increasing our ability to drive future revenue growth through the cross selling potential I mentioned earlier and realizing potential synergies that we anticipate from this deal, which we currently estimate to have a run rate conservatively of $7 million to $8 million, or as Maurizio mentioned, on a non-GAAP diluted net income per share basis, $0.02 to $0.03 of EPS accretion in fiscal year 2019, and $0.07 to $0.08 of EPS accretion in fiscal year 2020.

I'll wrap up by taking us through Slide 11, entitled illustrative shareholder value creation synergies what -- expected synergies. What we've tried to quantify here is shareholder value that we anticipate creating with this acquisition by building an illustrative value creation bridge. Using conservative synergy estimates as mentioned, we expect to generate incremental non-GAAP EPS for CASA of $0.07 to $0.08 in fiscal year 2020.

Using the number of shares outstanding, this represents $6 million to $7 million in non-GAAP net income for CASA in fiscal year 2020, and it causes current fiscal year 2020 consensus non-GAAP P/E multiple of 13.3 times. This $6 million to $7 million of additional net income equates to $80 million to $95 million of value for CASA's shareholders.

In other words, we anticipate that 70% to 85% of the total equity consideration paid by CASA will be covered by simple and quick to achieve Phase 1 synergies alone. And this calculation does not yet consider the fiscal year 2020 EBITDA that we're acquiring from NetComm and other material revenue synergies that we hope to achieve from this acquisition.

So with that, I will stop and hand it over to questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Simon Leopold from Raymond James. You're now live.

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Hi, guys. This is Victor Chiu in for Simon Leopold. Just a quick housekeeping. I'm sorry if I missed this, but can you again repeat the contributions from hardware and software in this quarter for fourth quarter?

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Yes, we're just looking it out, just give us a second.

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

During the fourth quarter, its contribution for hardware was $24.6 million and the contribution from software was $32.8 million.

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

$32.8 million?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes.

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Okay. Great, thank you. Okay. So just kind of clarifying on the outlook that you provided for 2019. The slowing implies that the issue extends beyond just the uptake of Remote PHY and DAA deployments, and that the core CCAP uptake as you see some headwinds back to you. So, can you just maybe give us a little more clarity into kind of what you see, what's kind of the shift and change in catalyst for this? And why we wouldn't expect this again in 2020 as well, since I guess previously we thought predominantly the issues were around DAA and Remote PHY, and maybe some wireless, but it seems like the core business is kind of slowing now a bit. So can you maybe just throw a little more color on that?

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Yes, Victor, this is Jerry here. So we -- as we mentioned in our prepared remarks we do see that the MSOs slowing down in their purchase of appliances and hardware during this transition period. And they are satisfying their capacity needs through software license purchases, while they make the decision on the next generation of their hardware upgrade. We do believe this period is going to be a short-term, but we have no way of knowing it exactly what that the next upgrade cycle is going to be.

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

So your estimation is that it's a timing issue and that you expect that this renowned (ph) simply because I'm just a little confused because why -- I'm just not sure why this wouldn't continue, I guess, and why you would expect that this is not secular kind of issue that we're looking at now, instead of just the timing issue, kind of debating deployment strategies.

Scott Bruckner -- Senior Vice President, Strategy & Corporate Development

Yes. No, look, that it's a good question. It's Scott here. I guess I would answer the question by trying to put this all in context. Let's remember that the MSOs are coming out of a very significant period of increased spend, and that entails not only technology upgrade, but moving to acquire capacity to deliver gigabit speeds to their customers. There was a lot of CapEx involved in that.

We always suspect it, although it was very difficult and I think maybe impossible to understand the timing for this that at some point that capacity acquisition would shift from hardware more to software. And that's what we're seeing now. Our view on growth of demand for downlink speeds of broadband has not changed. And in fact the conversations that we're having with our customers is about how they plan for that meeting that future demand. And there are a number of alternatives that they're looking at which include CCAP and that's a big acquisition because as you know that takes some space in the head end or other alternatives that involve virtualization and DAA.

We already saw one of our customers begin to move representing significant revenue in our quarter to DAA, so this transition is beginning to happen. We are just in the low period as we're moving through capacity absorption and a shift to new architecture.

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Great. That's helpful. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. You're now live.

Yuuji Anderson -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Hi. It's Yuuji Anderson on for Meta. Thanks for taking my question. A question on the gross margin guide. It's pretty conservative compared to prior years. So I'm just trying to better understand. I heard the commentary on the wireless core coming in the first half year. But I guess on its face, I would have thought because system sales are still slowing you would see that offset on the software side of things. So, I guess, it's just the question which is like just clarification, if the mix shift really -- the gross margin guidance really is a result of this -- is entirely a result of this mix shift to the wireless core, or how should we think about the mix of software versus chassis, and the other parts of the business there?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes, this is Maurizio. Thanks for the question. So we ended the fourth quarter, our gross margin was at 73%. And so, our guidance is between 65% and 70%. So not that much lower than where we really ended up at the fourth quarter. So we took a cautious approach in projecting out our gross margin. We do anticipate starting to really get some meaningful wireless revenue going forward, and the majority of that really is going to be on the hardware side, which has a lower gross margin. So we took that all into account and projecting out our gross margin for the year. And I just would say just overall I thought we took a cautious approach toward projecting that out, and then we'll update that as we move forward within the fiscal year.

Yuuji Anderson -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay. Understood. And then on the wireless backlog, I noticed the $20 million number that you gave in the prepared remarks there, so is that incremental to what has been disclosed in the past there? And I guess the follow-up is, when you look at your wireless backlog now like how much of that you think will be recognized in the first half, perhaps just on a -- you know just on a high level, like any color on that would be helpful?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

It includes the originally disclosed orders, and of course, we are adding new orders in wireless, while we continue to close deals on the wireless side. In terms of how much we're going to recognize in the first half, we cannot say accurately at this point, but we do believe we're going to continue to recognize every single quarter going forward.

Yuuji Anderson -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay. And if it's OK, just one more question on just the NetComm deal. I understand that's not built into guidance right now. But the elevated expenses on the wireless side of things, is that just wholly separate from anything you might be doing on integrating NetComm or definite to its integration?

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Correct.

Yuuji Anderson -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay, got it. Okay. Thank you so much for taking my questions.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from the line of Rich Valera from Needham & Company. You're now live.

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Thank you. I was wondering if you can give us a sense of roughly the magnitude of revenue you expect to come from new products in 2019?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Hi. Sorry, Rich, it's Maurizio. To our guidance there that we gave is between $250 million and $300 million. Now we still -- the majority of our revenue during the year is still from our cable business. But we're starting to see good amount of new wireless revenue coming in, and a few other products, new products coming on board. But the way to think about though is that we still are in the early phase of our new products and we're really going to start to see that later on this fiscal year.

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Right. And then just following up on the wireless backlog question from before, I'm confused why that didn't grow from $20 million. It didn't sound like you recognized much in 4Q if any and you've announced several new wireless orders. So why didn't that $20 million number grow during the quarter?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

The number did grow, Rich. As Jerry said, we did sign additional deals. We -- at the appropriate time, we'll disclose that number, but it is larger than $20 million.

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Is there any particular reason you can't disclose the size of it now?

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

No particular reason other than with $20 million, I think, you've got appropriate guidance on what we expect to recognize through the year.

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Okay. That's perfect. And just one more if I could on NetComm. I mean we're somewhat familiar with them and understand they have a quite large program with NBN. I'm wondering if you have the information sort of how much of the revenue in the last year was generated by NBN or just in the Asia-Pac region if you have that information and if you have sort of a sense for the trajectory of that? Thank you.

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So, let me -- honestly, I don't know what they publicly disclosed. I will check that and whatever is out there, I will get back to you with that information.

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

Okay. Appreciate that. Thank you.

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay. Sure.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Marchetti from Stifel. You're now live.

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

Thanks very much. Just a quick clarification on the DAA contribution that you mentioned in calendar 4Q. You mentioned that it was 17% of I think total revenue. I'm just curious in terms of it if that skews more toward hardware as nodes or shipped maybe without software, if it's split sort of in between those two lines, just trying to think of it as we started to see some of the initial DAA deployments, how to think of that may be impacting from a hardware, software perspective, and then how that maybe flows through a little bit to that gross margin outlook?

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

That deal was a combination of hardware and software. But we do expect more contributions from both the hardware and software going forward, even with that (inaudible).

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

Got it. So, that is when you're talking shipping in DDA like that, it is a combination of both hardware and software such skewed the way some initial hardware deployments are on the traditional sort of core cable side, and then you come back with sort of license sales or software sales over time.

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Correct. We do expect both software license increase as well as more hardware sales.

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

Okay, fair enough. And then when I think about this bigger push now Jerry into wireless, not just the investments that you're making and obviously the increased focus here in '19 and going forward, with NetComm now coming down, how do you think about competition in that market relative to what you're used to seeing in more of the cable market where maybe that the opportunity set obviously from a TAM perspective is significantly larger, but you also have a I think a much broader competitive landscape that you're butting up against there? Just curious how you think about competition and the right level of sort of resource allocation as you move into what is essentially a new market for you?

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Yes. We -- of course when we choose a tough market to address, we always think about how we can differentiate ourselves. We are not doing generic things to compete with the legacy wireless and technology providers. We always look at how do we leverage our strength, like how Apex Strand mounted a video, and we are leveraging our strength from both the wire-line side and wireless side is in a converged technology. So we have a significant differentiation. And on the 4G and 5G packet core, we're basically leveraging a new trend or a new generation of technology or the architecture transformation of the whole wireless network, not competing with the traditional chassis-based packet cores. So we're doing completely virtualized micro services based packet cores which are very different and differentiated than the traditional legacy players. We always choose something we think we are fairly unique and differentiated to compete.

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

Thank you. And then, lastly, just on sort of the cash position here. You certainly are in a comfortable spot now. As you pay this out, you mentioned wanting to do the $75 million buyback program over the extent at this calendar year, exiting the year then roughly at $100 million at least using where you ended sort of calendar 4Q. Does that give you plenty of comfort? You obviously feel like you've got enough cash there to continue to fund these wireless initiatives as you continue to expand that portfolio line.

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Hi. It's Maurizio. So we ended the year at a very nice cash position right around $280 million. Even with the acquisition, it brings us down to somewhere around $160 million. But at the end of the day, we are in a very good position even after the acquisition. So we have the opportunity to both give money back to shareholders in the share repurchase program and continue also to look at M&A opportunities in the future, select M&A opportunities. And on top of all that, be able to invest additional capital R&D to really push into the wireless market. So given our balance sheet where we are today, we feel like we're in a very good position in terms of capital.

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we have no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Well, thank you to everyone for joining us today, and we look forward to updating you on our progress next quarter, and seeing some of you at our Analyst Event at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona next week. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. This does conclude our teleconference for today. You may now disconnect your line at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.

Duration: 53 minutes

Call participants:

Eleanor Johnson -- Investor Relations

Jerry Guo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Maurizio Nicolelli -- Chief Financial Officer

Scott Bruckner -- Senior Vice President, Strategy & Corporate Development

Victor Chiu -- Raymond James -- Analyst

Yuuji Anderson -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Rich Valera -- Needham & Company -- Analyst

John Marchetti -- Stifel -- Analyst

More CASA analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

United Fire Group Inc (UFCS) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

United Fire Group Inc  (NASDAQ:UFCS)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 20, 2019, 10:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good morning. My name is Brandon, and I'll be the operator on today's call. Welcome to the United Fire Group Inc.'s 2018 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions)

After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions.

Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Randy Patten, AVP, Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Randy Patten -- Assistant Vice President, Finance & Investor Relations

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining this call. Earlier today, we issued a news release on our results. To find a copy of this document, please visit our website at ufginsurance.com. Press releases and slides are located under the Investor Relations tab.

Our speakers today are Chief Executive Officer, Randy Ramlo; Michael Wilkins, our Chief Operating Officer; and Dawn Jaffray, Chief Financial Officer. Please note that our presentation today may include forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions investors that any forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties and are not a guarantee of future performance. These forward-looking statements are based on management's current expectations and we assume no obligation to update them. The actual results may differ materially due to a variety of factors, which are described in our press release and SEC filings.

Please also note that in our discussion today, we may use some non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures are also available in our press release and SEC filings.

At this time, I'm pleased to present Mr. Randy Ramlo, CEO of UFG Insurance.

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Randy. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the UFG Insurance fourth quarter and year-end 2018 conference call. Earlier this morning, we reported a consolidated net loss of $1.17 per diluted share, and adjusted operating loss of $0.30 per diluted share and a GAAP combined ratio of 108.5% for the fourth quarter of 2018.

This compares with a net income of $1.81 per diluted share, adjusted operating income of $1.78 per diluted share and a GAAP combined ratio of 93.8% for the fourth quarter of 2017. For the full year of 2018, we reported net income of $1.08 per diluted share, adjusted operating income of $0.67 per diluted share and a GAAP combined ratio of 104%.

This compares with full year 2017 net income of $1.99 per diluted share, adjusted operating income of $1.79 per diluted share and a GAAP combined ratio of 104%. The fourth quarter of 2018 was a challenging one.

During 2018, we made steady progress, improving profitability on our commercial auto line. However, during the fourth quarter, we experienced an increase in severity of losses in both our commercial auto and general liability lines of business from auto-related claims due to several factors, including a trend toward higher court awards.

In response to this setback to profitability, we are taking several initiatives in pricing, underwriting and claims. All year, we have been working on initiatives to achieve pricing adequacy, focusing on risk control and took tough underwriting actions on underperforming accounts. Going forward, we will add initiatives to improve the profitability of our West Coast operation, incorporate analytically determined technical pricing at a more granular level and will implement several new claims initiatives.

Mike will address these initiatives and our strategy going forward in more detail in a few minutes. To assist in implementing our new initiatives in our West Coast region is Jeremy Bahl, who has assumed responsibility for leading our West Coast region. Jeremy has done a terrific job advancing culture, profit and production in our Rocky Mountain region and we look forward to seeing similar progress in the West Coast region in the coming months. Also to assist with our new claims initiatives, we appointed Corey Ruehle as our new Chief Claims Officer. Corey succeeds Dave Conner, who will begin his retirement in April 2019. First and foremost, we thank Dave Conner for his successful 20-year career at UFG and congratulate him on his retirement.

Prior to his appointment, Corey was the Vice President and Manager of our Midwest region. Corey has served UFG in various capacities, including as an underwriting supervisor and manager. Corey has a proven record of leading one of our most successful regions. With nearly two decades of underwriting experience, Corey offers a combination of deep insurance knowledge, strong leadership and a fresh new perspective on claims management, which will benefit him greatly in his new role.

Building off Dave's success, Corey has an exciting vision for the claims department at UFG, enhancing its ability to contribute to our profitability, and he will work to develop a strong and cohesive tie between claims and underwriting. I will wrap up my discussion today on our quarterly results. The change in adjusted operating income from the fourth quarter of 2017 to an adjusted operating loss in the fourth quarter of 2018 was $2.08.

This change was primarily driven by a deterioration in our core loss ratio, an increase in catastrophe losses, less favorable reserve development, lower investment income, and the prior year one-time tax benefit from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. These were all partially offset by an increase in net premiums earned.

During the fourth quarter of 2018, the deterioration in our core loss ratio was primarily driven by an increase in the severity of losses in our commercial auto and general liability lines of business, which accounted for $0.59 per diluted share of the decrease in adjusted operating earnings. All year, we made steady progress, reducing our frequency of losses and the number of insured commercial auto units. However, in the fourth quarter, severity increase is driven by social inflation of bodily injury claims from umbrella losses caused by commercial auto accidents. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we experienced an increase in catastrophe losses, which was primarily due to $9.2 million of losses from the California wildfires.

As a reminder, the losses from the California wildfires were from our commercial lines of business, we do not write personal lines in California. In the fourth quarter of 2018, cats added 5.9 points to our combined ratio, and $0.50 per diluted share as compared to 2 points on the combined ratio, and $0.13 per diluted share for a change quarter-over-quarter of $0.37.

Although, we saw an increase in cats in the fourth quarter of 2018, for the full year of 2018, our cat losses were well below our 10-year historical average. Cats only added 4.5 points to the combined ratio as compared to our 10-year historical average of 6.4 points, which we attribute to the successful management of our geographic exposures to cats.

In the fourth quarter of 2018, we had lower favorable reserve development compared to the fourth quarter of 2017, which accounted for $0.22 per share of the change. Although we recorded less favorable reserve development in the fourth quarter of 2018, full year 2018 reserve development was flat compared to 2017.

Dawn will discuss favorable reserve development in more detail later in this call. Also contributing to the change in adjusted operating income was the prior year one-time benefit from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the fourth quarter of 2017, which added $0.86 per diluted share to adjusted operating income in 2017.

The remaining difference is primarily due to a number of offsetting items, including lower investment income due to volatile equity markets in the fourth quarter of 2018 and an increase in net premiums earned.

With that, I will turn the discussion over to Mike Wilkins. Mike?

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Thanks, Randy, and good morning everyone. As Randy mentioned, the fourth quarter of 2018 was a challenging quarter and a setback to the progress that we have had on improving profitability of our commercial auto book of business. In response to this setback and profitability, we are responding with a number of strategic initiatives in addition to the initiatives we have been working on this year.

As always, these initiatives take time to implement and therefore may take some time to have an impact on our financial results. One area we are addressing is our West Coast operations, which has been a significant contributor to our adverse results. As Randy mentioned, we made a leadership change by appointing Jeremy Bahl to lead our West Coast operation.

Jeremy will focus on a number of strategic initiatives, which include a review of certain classes of business, which do not align with UFG's risk appetite, such as residential construction, habitational, fast food restaurants, and certain classes of heavy-wheeled commercial vehicles.

Over time, we will improve the West Coast mix of business and position United Fire & Casualty as the lead company for preferred business. Also we recognize we have a number of opportunities to create efficiencies in our underwriting and claims teams to make cross regional policy simpler to underwrite and improve claims administration, which will position UFG to compete for more attractive classes of business.

Finally, in our West Coast operation, we see an opportunity to improve profitability by strengthening our marketing plan and our agency plan. Our second major initiative to improve profitability is to incorporate analytically determined technical pricing at a more granular level into our underwriting processes with the assistance of our Enterprise Analytics team.

In the fourth quarter, our renewal pricing increases for commercial lines remained in the mid-single digits with pricing varying depending on the region and size of account. Renewal pricing increases continue to be driven by commercial auto pricing. Filed commercial auto rate increases during the fourth quarter 2018 averaged in the low double digits.

We will continue to focus on monitoring effective rate changes in targeted areas with our commercial auto book of business, seeking double-digit rate increases not only in the West Coast but other geographic locations such as Florida and Texas. We now realize that our rate increases have not been aggressive enough, given the increasing severity of losses. We will also expand our enforcement of vehicle use policies and the use of technologies such as LifeSaver app along with continued education of our insurers on distracted driving through our successful Worth It campaign.

Finally, with the successful implementation of our commercial auto analytics model, our Enterprise Analytics team has moved to development of a commercial property model. In addition to these underwriting initiatives, we will be implementing several new claims initiatives under the direction of our new Chief Claims Officer, Corey Ruehle.

These new initiatives are aimed at improving claims service including shortening cycle time and reducing claims cost, attorney involvement and the impact of litigation from seemingly increasing social inflation of jury awards, especially in our auto liability book. With that, I'll let Dawn Jaffray discuss our fourth quarter financials.

Dawn?

Dawn M. Jaffray -- Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Mike, and good morning everyone. As Randy and Mike both mentioned, the fourth quarter of 2018 was challenging. We reported a consolidated net loss of $29.3 million in the quarter compared to net income of $46 million in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Net income in the fourth quarter of 2018 was impacted by volatile equity markets. This resulted in a decrease in the value of equity securities recognized in the income statement in the amount of $21.7 million after tax. During the fourth quarter of 2017, UFG benefited from a one-time tax change of $21.9 million associated with remeasuring deferred taxes under the new lower corporate tax rate.

The remaining change in net income in the comparable fourth quarter was combination of an increase in severity of losses in our commercial auto and general liability lines stemming from auto-related claims, a decline in favorable reserve development and lower net investment income, all partially offset by an increase in net premiums earned.

For the full year 2018, consolidated net income was $27.7 million compared to $51 million in 2017. 2018 net income was also impacted by the decrease in the fair value of equity securities as of the end of the year. As a result, we had an after-tax loss of $17.4 million associated with these changes in value. Also contributing to the change in net income year-over-year were some one-time items. In 2018, we recognized the $27.3 million gain on sale of United Life and in 2017, we recognized a one-time tax benefit of $21.9 million.

The remaining change in net income for the full year of 2018 as compared to 2017 was due to an increase in expenses offset by an increase in net premiums earned. In the fourth quarter and full year 2018, our net premiums earned increased 4.1% and 4% respectively over 2017. These increases were within management's expectations.

Commercial auto continues to be our line of business with the most premium growth, but the increase in this line is driven primarily by rate increases. 2018 net investment income decreased 29% in the fourth quarter and increased 3.3% compared to the same periods in 2017. The decrease in net investment income for the quarter was driven by a $5.9 million decrease in the value of our investments in limited liability partnerships due to the volatility in equity markets, specifically related to financial institutions.

For the full year of 2018, the increase in net investment income is due to an increase in invested assets. Moving on to reserve development, we recognized favorable reserve development of $6.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 compared to favorable reserve development of $16.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2017.

For the fourth quarter of 2018, the biggest driver of our favorable reserve development was within our workers' compensation and assumed reinsurance lines, partially offset by unfavorable development in general liability and commercial fire and allied. For the full year of 2018, we recognized favorable development of $54.2 million, which was flat compared to $54.3 million in the full year 2017.

The impact to the combined ratio was 5.2 percentage points in 2018 compared to 5.4% percentage points in 2017. As a reminder, we continue to maintain a conservative reserving philosophy with annual favorable reserve development every year since 2009. Favorable reserve development varies year-to-year. At December 31st, 2018, total reserves remained within our actuarial estimates. The combined ratio in the fourth quarter and year-to-date in 2018 was 108.5% and 104% respectively, compared with 93.8% and 104% for the same periods in 2017.

Removing the impact of catastrophe losses and reserve development, our 2018 core loss ratio deteriorated 7.1 percentage points in the quarter and 0.4% percentage points for the full year as compared to the same periods of 2017.

Referring to slide nine in the slide deck on our website, we've provided a detailed reconciliation of the impact of catastrophe and development on the combined ratio.

Moving on to expenses. Our expense ratio was 33.1% in the fourth quarter of 2018 with a slight decrease compared to 33.3% in the fourth quarter 2017. For the full year 2018, our expense ratio was 33.5% compared to 31.2% for 2017. The increase is primarily due to our continued investment in upgrading our OASIS underwriting technology and analytics platform.

As a reminder, we anticipate the OASIS Project will add approximately one to two points annually to the expense ratio for the duration of the project. Continuing to proactively manage our tax position, we contributed an additional $10 million to our pension plan during 2018 to take advantage of the benefit of the deduction of the 35% corporate income tax rate for the prior year.

We've made similar contributions over the preceding three years, which along with good pension portfolio returns, have improved our funded status and reduced future pension expenses. In addition, we undertook amending certain aspects of our post retirement medical plan benefits to take effect in 2019.

These changes combined with other changes in assumptions will result in a reduction to our annual pension and post-retirement benefit expenses of approximately $7 million during 2019.

I will end today's portion of our prepared remarks with a short discussion on capital management matters. With no debt in our capital structure, our annualized return on equity was 3% in 2018, compared to 5.3% in 2017. The decrease in return on equity year-over-year is primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of equity securities offset by the recognition of the gain on sale of United Life in the first quarter of 2018 and the one-time tax benefit associated with the Tax Act changes recognized in 2017.

For the full year of 2018, we have returned a total of $111 million in the form of regular and special dividends and share repurchases. During the first quarter, we repurchased shares totaling $5.4 million and for the year, we paid dividends of $4.21 per share through the regular quarterly cash dividend and the $3 special dividend paid in August of 2018. And lastly, as a point of reference, over the last five years we have returned over $250 million to shareholders through cash dividends and share repurchases.

And with that, I will now open the line for questions. Operator.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Paul Newsome with Sandler O'Neill. Please go ahead.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Good morning, everyone. Thanks for the call. I guess, could you give us a little bit more detail about the tie between the, I guess, you said umbrella losses that were caused by the commercial losses? Are you just simply talking about umbrella insurance that was written on the same account as the commercial auto?

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Paul, this is Randy. That's exactly it. We had quite a few losses that went through the underlying policy limits and got solidly into the umbrella coverage that we provided. So in part, some of those were court awards, but a lot of them involved severe bodily injury and oftentimes fatalities. So you're exactly right.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

So was there reinsurance that would cap some of that or does that just -- is that kind of a --?

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, we retained $2 million --

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

$2.5 million of each loss. So if we had a $3 million, $4 million loss, some of that would be -- we'd get some relief from the umbrella.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

And then could you reconcile kind of a more general comment, you said that you're making progress on the commercial auto business but the results actually got worse. So is that purely a mechanical process or is it -- I'm just having a little -- struggling with that a little bit.

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Paul, this is Mike Wilkins. If you look at the results for the year, auto did improve about 11 points from 106 to 95 and as we look at progress, we try to focus on a quarter, we've made improvements in our moving average auto loss ratio four consecutive quarters prior to the fourth quarter. The fourth quarter, I would say, was disappointing and unexpected that we took a step backwards. So we're recalibrating a little bit. The steps that we're taking, I think, we are still making progress, maybe just not at the pace that we had thought we are making progress prior to the fourth quarter.

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

And Paul, this is Randy, some things like the number of insured vehicles we track, and that is down, so that means our exposure, it should be moving in the right direction. We're starting to see some improvement in frequency of losses and even other than the fourth quarter, we've seeing some improvement on the severity side.

So normally in underwriting, you focus on frequency not so much on severity, but in a given quarter severity can make some material result. So those are some of the areas that we do think we were making some good progress and then in the fourth quarter, as we said a bunch of big severity losses kind of took it all back.

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Paul, this is Mike again. Maybe just to elaborate a little bit further, the other thing I would say is our results in the fourth quarter were lumpy across regions. So while we had some regions that continue to make good progress like our Midwest region, which is one of our largest regions, we had other regions that took a big step backwards, particularly our West Coast which had just a really bad fourth quarter. Also our Gulf Coast was disappointing, driven by states like California and Texas where we've seen more challenging issues to address on the auto side.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

So I guess last question, and then I'll let somebody else ask. The personal auto seems to be having the same -- the private passenger auto seems to be having some of the same underwriting issues as the commercial auto, but I haven't seen that in most other companies. Is something else going on in the private passenger auto that's different, that is also -- I know it's a it's a smaller business, but it also seem to be a bit of issue.

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

I would say same drivers. This is Mike, again, the distracted driving mileage being up, we saw a bigger improvement on the personal auto side than we did in the commercial auto side. But I think a lot of the same drivers are at play there. We have looked at the industry and seen maybe more significant improvement for the industry. On the personal line side, I think we also saw more significant improvement but maybe started at a worse place than some others in the industry.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

So are you still seeing higher frequency in private passenger auto?

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Randy mentioned, we have started to see that turn. So that is encouraging. It's only been a quarter or two, so I'm not sure I would call it a long-term trend yet, but maybe an encouraging first step in our battle to improve auto results.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Because I think frequency has been favorable in '17 and '18 for the industry. So that would suggest that for some reason, there's something different between your book and the rest of the industry. Any thoughts on why that might be different?

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Well, on the personal side, I don't have an answer for you why that would be different. I think on the commercial side, if you look at some of the areas that we write a lot of our business, primarily in the construction industry, I think a lot of that brings tough auto with it. We're evaluating our portfolio approach to the business and how we might need to change that portfolio going forward to write segments of business that are not so heavy in the auto. We're pushing hard on small commercial, which is a segment where the auto has been performing better and tends to come with less auto. So we're evaluating things beyond just the auto line of business to try to solve this problem.

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you very much.

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Paul.

Operator

(Operator Instructions) It appears there are no further questions, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Randy Patten, AVP and Investor Relations, for closing remarks.

Randy Patten -- Assistant Vice President, Finance & Investor Relations

That concludes our conference call. Thank you for joining us and have a great day.

Operator

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.

Duration: 27 minutes

Call participants:

Randy Patten -- Assistant Vice President, Finance & Investor Relations

Randy A. Ramlo -- President & Chief Executive Officer

Michael T. Wilkins -- EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Dawn M. Jaffray -- Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Paul Newsome -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

More UFCS analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Birchcliff Energy (BIR) PT Lowered to C$7.00 at TD Securities

Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR) had its target price trimmed by TD Securities from C$7.50 to C$7.00 in a research report report published on Friday morning. The firm currently has an action list buy rating on the oil and natural gas company’s stock.

BIR has been the topic of several other research reports. Canaccord Genuity dropped their target price on shares of Birchcliff Energy from C$6.50 to C$4.25 in a research note on Thursday, January 10th. GMP Securities dropped their target price on shares of Birchcliff Energy from C$7.25 to C$6.25 in a research note on Friday, November 16th. Raymond James dropped their target price on shares of Birchcliff Energy from C$7.25 to C$7.00 in a research note on Wednesday, January 9th. Royal Bank of Canada dropped their target price on shares of Birchcliff Energy from C$6.00 to C$4.00 in a research note on Tuesday, January 8th. Finally, Eight Capital upped their target price on shares of Birchcliff Energy from C$4.50 to C$4.75 in a research note on Thursday. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a hold rating, four have issued a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the stock. The company presently has an average rating of Buy and a consensus target price of C$6.15.

Get Birchcliff Energy alerts:

Shares of TSE BIR opened at C$3.55 on Friday. The company has a market capitalization of $943.98 million and a PE ratio of 18.21. Birchcliff Energy has a 52-week low of C$2.57 and a 52-week high of C$5.45. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 40.06, a quick ratio of 0.68 and a current ratio of 0.86.

Birchcliff Energy Company Profile

Birchcliff Energy Ltd., an intermediate oil and gas company, explores for, develops, and produces natural gas, light oil, and natural gas liquids in Western Canada. The company holds interests in the Montney/Doig resource play, as well as other natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids assets located in the Peace River Arch area of Alberta.

Recommended Story: Stock Symbols and CUSIP Explained

Analyst Recommendations for Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR)

$1.00 Earnings Per Share Expected for Meta Financial Group Inc. (CASH) This Quarter

Equities research analysts expect Meta Financial Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CASH) to post earnings per share (EPS) of $1.00 for the current quarter, according to Zacks Investment Research. Two analysts have made estimates for Meta Financial Group’s earnings. The lowest EPS estimate is $0.87 and the highest is $1.13. Meta Financial Group reported earnings per share of $1.22 in the same quarter last year, which suggests a negative year over year growth rate of 18%. The firm is expected to announce its next earnings results on Monday, April 29th.

On average, analysts expect that Meta Financial Group will report full-year earnings of $2.52 per share for the current financial year, with EPS estimates ranging from $2.50 to $2.54. For the next year, analysts expect that the firm will post earnings of $3.51 per share. Zacks’ EPS averages are a mean average based on a survey of research firms that cover Meta Financial Group.

Get Meta Financial Group alerts:

Meta Financial Group (NASDAQ:CASH) last released its quarterly earnings data on Monday, January 28th. The savings and loans company reported $0.39 EPS for the quarter, missing analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.43 by ($0.04). Meta Financial Group had a net margin of 15.76% and a return on equity of 11.61%. The business had revenue of $98.02 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $98.55 million.

A number of research firms recently issued reports on CASH. Zacks Investment Research downgraded Meta Financial Group from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Tuesday, November 13th. BidaskClub upgraded Meta Financial Group from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Thursday, January 31st. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, two have given a hold rating, one has assigned a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the stock. The company has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $36.75.

In other news, CEO Bradley C. Hanson purchased 20,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, December 6th. The shares were purchased at an average price of $21.43 per share, for a total transaction of $428,600.00. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, CFO Glen William Herrick purchased 5,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, December 7th. The shares were purchased at an average price of $21.02 per share, for a total transaction of $105,100.00. Following the purchase, the chief financial officer now directly owns 209,108 shares in the company, valued at $4,395,450.16. The disclosure for this purchase can be found here. Insiders have purchased a total of 25,466 shares of company stock worth $543,505 in the last 90 days. 7.69% of the stock is currently owned by company insiders.

Several hedge funds have recently made changes to their positions in CASH. Raymond James & Associates grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 43.8% in the 2nd quarter. Raymond James & Associates now owns 11,443 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $1,115,000 after purchasing an additional 3,487 shares during the last quarter. Bank of America Corp DE grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 148.1% in the 2nd quarter. Bank of America Corp DE now owns 27,709 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $2,699,000 after purchasing an additional 16,542 shares during the last quarter. Millennium Management LLC purchased a new position in shares of Meta Financial Group in the 2nd quarter valued at approximately $5,084,000. California Public Employees Retirement System grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 28.1% in the 2nd quarter. California Public Employees Retirement System now owns 21,238 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $2,069,000 after purchasing an additional 4,653 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Northern Trust Corp grew its stake in shares of Meta Financial Group by 6.8% in the 2nd quarter. Northern Trust Corp now owns 146,894 shares of the savings and loans company’s stock valued at $14,308,000 after purchasing an additional 9,394 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 24.57% of the company’s stock.

Shares of CASH traded up $0.52 during mid-day trading on Monday, reaching $24.96. The company’s stock had a trading volume of 209,344 shares, compared to its average volume of 364,334. The company has a market cap of $983.92 million, a P/E ratio of 8.88 and a beta of 1.32. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.12, a quick ratio of 0.66 and a current ratio of 0.66. Meta Financial Group has a 12-month low of $18.01 and a 12-month high of $39.28.

Meta Financial Group Company Profile

Meta Financial Group, Inc operates as the holding company for MetaBank that offers various banking products and services in the United States. The company accepts various deposit products, including statement savings accounts, money market savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, and checking accounts; and deposits related to prepaid cards, which primarily comprise checking accounts and certificate accounts.

Featured Story: Understanding Market Liquidity

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Meta Financial Group (CASH)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com